Interesting analysis, thank you. My own reading was that AlexMennen showed that the canonical story with only minor changes matches the EY’s narrative pretty well, so I upvoted it.
FWIW, the original post annoyed me in many of the same ways, and would have done so far more if EY hadn’t at least made a nod towards articulating the point he was making.
Interesting analysis, thank you. My own reading was that AlexMennen showed that the canonical story with only minor changes matches the EY’s narrative pretty well, so I upvoted it.
(nods) It certainly does.
FWIW, the original post annoyed me in many of the same ways, and would have done so far more if EY hadn’t at least made a nod towards articulating the point he was making.