his definition of ‘porn’ as he applies it to Card’s writing in that essay would qualify any work I can think of as ‘porn’, if the reviewer didn’t like it.
I have to disagree. The repetitive and episodic nature of the plot is the main point of the “pornography” analogy. Not every lousy book has these features.
I have to disagree. The repetitive and episodic nature of the plot is the main point of the “pornography” analogy. Not every lousy book has these features.