The idea that a robot that moves around randomly and generates explanations would appear intelligent to onlookers might be true, but not very interesting.
The idea that there is nothing more to human intelligence than that is just silly. Besides randomly bouncing around, humans play chess, predict the weather, build bridges, and make long term plans in general. Those are not so easy to reproduce. By the way, as I recall Scott Adams saying himself, it’s best not to take a cartoonist seriously.
In what way is this testable?
The idea that a robot that moves around randomly and generates explanations would appear intelligent to onlookers might be true, but not very interesting.
The idea that there is nothing more to human intelligence than that is just silly. Besides randomly bouncing around, humans play chess, predict the weather, build bridges, and make long term plans in general. Those are not so easy to reproduce. By the way, as I recall Scott Adams saying himself, it’s best not to take a cartoonist seriously.