If it is true that “if God exists, then the rational thing is to hope and not in just the improbable but the impossible”, then that fact is itself strong evidence against the existence of God.
But who said anything about sacrificing hope? Eliezer argues against wishful thinking, which is not at all the same thing as hope. Oh, and the idea that “faith, hope and love” are the same kind of thing—so much the same kind of thing that abandoning two of them would be likely to lead to abandoning the third—seems to me to have no support at all outside the First Letter to the Corinthians; why should Eliezer fear that abandoning faith and (what you rather bizarrely call) hope should lead to abandoning love?
If it is true that “if God exists, then the rational thing is to hope and not in just the improbable but the impossible”, then that fact is itself strong evidence against the existence of God.
But who said anything about sacrificing hope? Eliezer argues against wishful thinking, which is not at all the same thing as hope. Oh, and the idea that “faith, hope and love” are the same kind of thing—so much the same kind of thing that abandoning two of them would be likely to lead to abandoning the third—seems to me to have no support at all outside the First Letter to the Corinthians; why should Eliezer fear that abandoning faith and (what you rather bizarrely call) hope should lead to abandoning love?