AFAICT the main value in addressing such concerns in detail consists would lie in convincing AGI researchers to change their course of action. Do you think this would actually occur?
To answer this question it seems like it would be useful to understand the motives behind those researching AGI. I don’t know much about this. Maybe those who have interacted with these researchers (or the researchers themselves) can shed some light?
AFAICT the main value in addressing such concerns in detail consists would lie in convincing AGI researchers to change their course of action. Do you think this would actually occur?
It depends on how convincing the argument is.
I think 1 in 5 would change if they heard a obviously correct argument.
To answer this question it seems like it would be useful to understand the motives behind those researching AGI. I don’t know much about this. Maybe those who have interacted with these researchers (or the researchers themselves) can shed some light?