When I was considering a better name for the problem, I couldn’t find a word for the process of seeking truth, which is what’s actually being derailed by logical rudeness.
Unless I’ve missed something, the problem with logical rudeness isn’t that there’s no logical flaw in it.
The fact that I’ve got 4 karma points suggests (but doesn’t prove) that I’m not the only person who has a problem with the term “logical rudeness”. I should have been clearer that “anti-logical rudeness” was just an attempt at an improvement, rather than a strong proposal for that particular change.
I think you’re complaining about the problem of people not updating on their evidence by using anti-epistemological techniques such as logical rudeness.
I still don’t see the need for changing the name, but I’ll defer to the opinion of the crowd if need be.
When I was considering a better name for the problem, I couldn’t find a word for the process of seeking truth, which is what’s actually being derailed by logical rudeness.
Unless I’ve missed something, the problem with logical rudeness isn’t that there’s no logical flaw in it.
The fact that I’ve got 4 karma points suggests (but doesn’t prove) that I’m not the only person who has a problem with the term “logical rudeness”. I should have been clearer that “anti-logical rudeness” was just an attempt at an improvement, rather than a strong proposal for that particular change.
I think you’re complaining about the problem of people not updating on their evidence by using anti-epistemological techniques such as logical rudeness.
I still don’t see the need for changing the name, but I’ll defer to the opinion of the crowd if need be.