Wonderful article, thanks. I’m fond of reminders of this type that scientific advances are very seldom as discrete, as irreversible, as incontrovertible as the myths of science often give them to be.
When you look at the detailed stories of scientific progress you see false starts, blind alleys, half-baked theories that happen by luck to predict phenomena and mostly sound ones that unfortunately fail on key bits of evidence, and a lot of hard work going into sorting it all out (not to mention, often enough, a good dose of luck). The manglish view, if nothing else, strikes me as a good vitamin for people wanting an antidote to the scurvy of overconfidence.
ETA: The article made for a great dinnertime story to my kids. Only one of the three, the oldest (13yo) was familiar with the term “scurvy”—and with the cure as well; both from One Piece. Manga 1 - school 0.
Wonderful article, thanks. I’m fond of reminders of this type that scientific advances are very seldom as discrete, as irreversible, as incontrovertible as the myths of science often give them to be.
When you look at the detailed stories of scientific progress you see false starts, blind alleys, half-baked theories that happen by luck to predict phenomena and mostly sound ones that unfortunately fail on key bits of evidence, and a lot of hard work going into sorting it all out (not to mention, often enough, a good dose of luck). The manglish view, if nothing else, strikes me as a good vitamin for people wanting an antidote to the scurvy of overconfidence.
ETA: The article made for a great dinnertime story to my kids. Only one of the three, the oldest (13yo) was familiar with the term “scurvy”—and with the cure as well; both from One Piece. Manga 1 - school 0.