If you don’t go looking for it, you won’t find it.
Rather than chastising me, why not explain how “forbidden” is objective?
Re: shooting people: it was a joke. The WTF was not with respect to shooting people. It was because your demand was a non sequitur.
For start: are you aware of various (googleablle) standard defenses of metaethical ojectivism?
Is there some other place where you have defended metaethical (or even moral) objectivism?
I am aware of various defenses and find them all thoroughly lacking, but I doubt I have exhausted even the common possibilities. Go for it.
Rather than chastising me, why not explain how “forbidden” is objective?
Re: shooting people: it was a joke. The WTF was not with respect to shooting people. It was because your demand was a non sequitur.
For start: are you aware of various (googleablle) standard defenses of metaethical ojectivism?
Is there some other place where you have defended metaethical (or even moral) objectivism?
I am aware of various defenses and find them all thoroughly lacking, but I doubt I have exhausted even the common possibilities. Go for it.