“Swoops in, takes one child, and leaves”… wow. I’d like to say I can’t imagine being so insensitive as to think this would be a good thing to do (even if not worth the money), but I actually can.
And why would you use that horrible example, when the arguement would work just fine if you substituted “A permanent presence devoted to giving one person three square meals a day.”
“Swoops in, takes one child, and leaves”… wow. I’d like to say I can’t imagine being so insensitive as to think this would be a good thing to do (even if not worth the money), but I actually can.
And why would you use that horrible example, when the arguement would work just fine if you substituted “A permanent presence devoted to giving one person three square meals a day.”