I’d go with: Probability exists in your mind, not the world, but there still is an “objective” way to calculate it.
I like it. In the spirit of iterative improvement, how about this:
Probabilities are subjective, but the information they represent is not. Use all available information on pain of paradox.
I propose an iteration with “on pain of paradox” truncated.
I’m split on this one. I like it better without “pain of paradox,” but it seemed like a third of the book was devoted to pains and paradoxes arising from ignoring information.
I’d go with: Probability exists in your mind, not the world, but there still is an “objective” way to calculate it.
I like it. In the spirit of iterative improvement, how about this:
Probabilities are subjective, but the information they represent is not. Use all available information on pain of paradox.
I propose an iteration with “on pain of paradox” truncated.
I’m split on this one. I like it better without “pain of paradox,” but it seemed like a third of the book was devoted to pains and paradoxes arising from ignoring information.