Why does it work? Best practices for optimizing test scores with Anki? Drawbacks or things to avoid? Success stories? Are there people with learning-styles where Anki would not be effective?
People don’t have something like inherent learning styles. They have strategies for learning.
Using Anki is a learning style.
One frequent error when making Anki cards is to think that the card should contain the solution to an exam question. That leads to cards that are too complicated.
Some psychologists and neuroscientists have questioned the scientific basis for and the theories on which they are based. According to Susan Greenfield the practice is “nonsense” from a neuroscientific point of view: “Humans have evolved to build a picture of the world through our senses working in unison, exploiting the immense interconnectivity that exists in the brain.” Many educational psychologists believe that there is little evidence for the efficacy of most learning style models, and furthermore, that the models often rest on dubious theoretical grounds. According to Stahl, there has been an “utter failure to find that assessing children’s learning styles and matching to instructional methods has any effect on their learning.”
A non-peer-reviewed literature review by authors from the University of Newcastle upon Tyne identified 71 different theories of learning style. (...) Coffield’s team found that none of the most popular learning style theories had been adequately validated through independent research, leading to the conclusion that the idea of a learning cycle, the consistency of visual, auditory and kinesthetic preferences and the value of matching teaching and learning styles were all “highly questionable.”
an adequate evaluation of the learning styles hypothesis—the idea that optimal learning demands that students receive instruction tailored to their learning styles—requires a particular kind of study. Specifically, students should be grouped into the learning style categories that are being evaluated (e.g., visual learners vs. verbal learners), and then students in each group must be randomly assigned to one of the learning methods (e.g., visual learning or verbal learning), so that some students will be “matched” and others will be “mismatched”. At the end of the experiment, all students must sit for the same test. If the learning style hypothesis is correct, then, for example, visual learners should learn better with the visual method, whereas auditory learners should learn better with auditory method. (...) studies utilizing this essential research design were virtually absent from the learning styles literature. In fact, the panel was able to find only a few studies with this research design, and all but one of these studies were negative findings—that is, they found that the same learning method was superior for all kinds of students (...) As a consequence, the panel concluded, “at present, there is no adequate evidence base to justify incorporating learning styles assessments into general educational practice. Thus, limited education resources would better be devoted to adopting other educational practices that have strong evidence base, of which there are an increasing number.”
So it seems to me that it’s actually a lot of different theories, and none of them has an experimental proof. The evidence seems to actually point the other way.
My interpretation is, if you start using pictures in your class and you get better results, that’s not because you have finally provided something useful to the “visual learners”, but because you have provided something useful for everyone.
People don’t have something like inherent learning styles. They have strategies for learning. Using Anki is a learning style.
One frequent error when making Anki cards is to think that the card should contain the solution to an exam question. That leads to cards that are too complicated.
http://www.supermemo.com/articles/20rules.htm is a good introduction to how SRS works.
Could you expand on this? (Or point me to something already written.)
Perhaps wikipedia would be a good starting point.
So it seems to me that it’s actually a lot of different theories, and none of them has an experimental proof. The evidence seems to actually point the other way.
My interpretation is, if you start using pictures in your class and you get better results, that’s not because you have finally provided something useful to the “visual learners”, but because you have provided something useful for everyone.
Could you define a question? There seems to be a lot of things that I could say on the topic.
Are you talking about basically the same stuff in Viliam_Bur’s comment?
Did you mean to say “strategy” instead of “style” here?
Thanks.