I think you’re falling for the curse of knowledge. Most people are so naive that they do think their, e.g., vision is a “direct experience” of reality. The more simplistic books are needed to bridge the inferential gap.
I’m ignoring that gap unless I find out that a bulk of the people reading my stuff think that way. I’m more writing to what feels like the edge of interesting and relevant to me.
I think you’re falling for the curse of knowledge. Most people are so naive that they do think their, e.g., vision is a “direct experience” of reality. The more simplistic books are needed to bridge the inferential gap.
I’m ignoring that gap unless I find out that a bulk of the people reading my stuff think that way. I’m more writing to what feels like the edge of interesting and relevant to me.