The most important thing right now: I still don’t know why they chose to fire Altman, and especially why they chose to do it so quickly.
That’s an exceedingly costly choice to make (i.e. with the speed of it), and so when I start to speculate on why, I only come up with commensurately worrying states of affair e.g. he did something egregious enough to warrant it, or he didn’t and the board acted with great hostility.
Them going back on their decision is bayesian evidence for the latter — if he’d done something egregious, they’d just be able to tell relevant folks, and Altman wouldn’t get his job back.
So many people are asking this (e.g. everyone at the company). I’ll be very worried if the reason doesn’t come out.
The most important thing right now: I still don’t know why they chose to fire Altman, and especially why they chose to do it so quickly.
That’s an exceedingly costly choice to make (i.e. with the speed of it), and so when I start to speculate on why, I only come up with commensurately worrying states of affair e.g. he did something egregious enough to warrant it, or he didn’t and the board acted with great hostility.
Them going back on their decision is bayesian evidence for the latter — if he’d done something egregious, they’d just be able to tell relevant folks, and Altman wouldn’t get his job back.
So many people are asking this (e.g. everyone at the company). I’ll be very worried if the reason doesn’t come out.