It seems worth mentioning that punishments for financial crime often include measures like “person gets banned from their industry” or them getting banned from participating in all kinds of financial schemes… But in theory, I like the idea of adding things to the sentencing that make re-offending less likely. This way, you can maybe justify giving people second chances.
Good point. I can imagine things like “permanent parole” (note that probation and parole are meaningfully different) or being under house arrest or having constraints on your professional responsibilities or finances or something, being far better than literal incarceration.
Good point. I can imagine things like “permanent parole” (note that probation and parole are meaningfully different) or being under house arrest or having constraints on your professional responsibilities or finances or something, being far better than literal incarceration.