> I will note that I found the “Rosenberg’s crux” section pretty hard to read, because it was quite dense.
Yeah, you’re right—thanks for the concrete feedback !
I wasn’t originally planning to make this a public post and later failed to take a step back and properly model what it would be like as a reader without the context of having read the letter exchange.
I consider adding a short intro paragraph to partially remedy this.
Thanks :)
> I will note that I found the “Rosenberg’s crux” section pretty hard to read, because it was quite dense.
Yeah, you’re right—thanks for the concrete feedback !
I wasn’t originally planning to make this a public post and later failed to take a step back and properly model what it would be like as a reader without the context of having read the letter exchange.
I consider adding a short intro paragraph to partially remedy this.
Makes sense! An intro paragraph could be good :)