You could even say that “could” for an action is always defined relative to the agent who takes that action, in which case I can simultaneously make the following two statements:
NonSuicidalGuy could jump off the cliff.
It is impossible that NonSuicidalGuy will hit the ground.
Isn’t that a logical mistake, though? Fow that to be correct, it must be that NonSuicidalGuy will hit the ground if and only if he chooses to jump off the cliff.
Isn’t that a logical mistake, though? Fow that to be correct, it must be that NonSuicidalGuy will hit the ground if and only if he chooses to jump off the cliff.