You know Bostrom is arguing against unification, right?
Yes, where did I give the impression that I didn’t?
“I do. Unification (Bostrom’s term) seems to be almost irrefutable, and therefore Dust Theory is at least partly right.”
I said it was Bostrom’s term. How is that a wrong impression?
Its easy to make the inference that it’s Bostrom argument that seems irrefutable, particularly as you didnt give one of your own.
You know Bostrom is arguing against unification, right?
Yes, where did I give the impression that I didn’t?
“I do. Unification (Bostrom’s term) seems to be almost irrefutable, and therefore Dust Theory is at least partly right.”
I said it was Bostrom’s term. How is that a wrong impression?
Its easy to make the inference that it’s Bostrom argument that seems irrefutable, particularly as you didnt give one of your own.