If you have one position and two potential hires Shapley Values doesn’t say You the Employer had to pay them the same.
You hire one, and another business hire the other. Together you and the other business “should” pay the Shapley Values.
If you apply Shapley value to a situation where there are more workers than jobs, regardless of how many businesses the jobs are split between, people who can’t get jobs still have a nonzero Shapley value based on their counterfactual contribution to the enterprises they could be working at.
If you have one position and two potential hires Shapley Values doesn’t say You the Employer had to pay them the same. You hire one, and another business hire the other. Together you and the other business “should” pay the Shapley Values.
If you apply Shapley value to a situation where there are more workers than jobs, regardless of how many businesses the jobs are split between, people who can’t get jobs still have a nonzero Shapley value based on their counterfactual contribution to the enterprises they could be working at.
Sure. That seems very sensible to me. I don’t see the problem?