My advice is based on my observing the track record of different people thinking about metaphysics, and generalizing habits that I think explain why some metaphysicians do better than others.
Before accepting my advice, I’d expect philosophers to first want to hash out a bunch of object-level disputes with me to establish why I think this vs. that philosopher is performing better in the first place.
For your readers’ benefit, maybe just say what you mean, or actively look for a crux, instead of fencing/sparring? I’m having a very hard time figuring out what you are thinking.
My advice is based on my observing the track record of different people thinking about metaphysics, and generalizing habits that I think explain why some metaphysicians do better than others.
Before accepting my advice, I’d expect philosophers to first want to hash out a bunch of object-level disputes with me to establish why I think this vs. that philosopher is performing better in the first place.
You seem to be saying that humanistic philosophy fails..but how are you judging that?
For your readers’ benefit, maybe just say what you mean, or actively look for a crux, instead of fencing/sparring? I’m having a very hard time figuring out what you are thinking.
I don’t have to belong to some fixed ideology.