I don’t see why. Even if I thought panpsychism were true, I don’t think it would help resolve most of the things analytic philosopher metaphysicians are debating.
Things like idealsm versus dualism versus materialism are topics in metaphysics that are downstream of the MBP. -- there’s no motivation to reject materliasim other than accounting for subjectivity/consciousness. Other topics, like realism versus conceptualism versus nominalism are not particularly downstream of the MBP.
You’re quoting from my section on metaphysics, not my section on philosophy of mind.
I know. “The mind body problem is key to much of metaphysics”.
I don’t see why. Even if I thought panpsychism were true, I don’t think it would help resolve most of the things analytic philosopher metaphysicians are debating.
Things like idealsm versus dualism versus materialism are topics in metaphysics that are downstream of the MBP. -- there’s no motivation to reject materliasim other than accounting for subjectivity/consciousness. Other topics, like realism versus conceptualism versus nominalism are not particularly downstream of the MBP.