You omitted a crucial paragraph break. :-)
The Aviello testimony would exonerate Guede (and hence is unlikely to be true); the Alessi testimony is essentially consistent with everything else we know, and isn’t particularly surprising at all.
I’ve edited the comment to clarify.
Ahhhh… ok I see where the misunderstanding was now.
You omitted a crucial paragraph break. :-)
The Aviello testimony would exonerate Guede (and hence is unlikely to be true); the Alessi testimony is essentially consistent with everything else we know, and isn’t particularly surprising at all.
I’ve edited the comment to clarify.
Ahhhh… ok I see where the misunderstanding was now.