My conclusion still holds if you simply need mathematicians in the top 10%, for example, only the analysis is slightly more complicated.
More than 1% of the world is racist.
Also, taboo “racist” unless you agree with faul_sname’s definition, in which case whether being a “racist” is a bad thing is precisely the question under discussion.
My conclusion still holds if you simply need mathematicians in the top 10%, for example, only the analysis is slightly more complicated.
So you agree that, in the original example, you’re more likely than not just being a racist? Because you certainly seem to be moving the goal post over to “top 10%” …
faul_sname’s definition
That link does not appear to point to a definition.
99% of projects do not need the top 1%. More than 1% of the world is racist.
Why should I believe you actually need the top 1%, when the statistics say there’s a greater than 50% chance that you’re actually just racist?
My conclusion still holds if you simply need mathematicians in the top 10%, for example, only the analysis is slightly more complicated.
Also, taboo “racist” unless you agree with faul_sname’s definition, in which case whether being a “racist” is a bad thing is precisely the question under discussion.
So you agree that, in the original example, you’re more likely than not just being a racist? Because you certainly seem to be moving the goal post over to “top 10%” …
That link does not appear to point to a definition.
You still haven’t defined what you mean by “racist”.