… then includes a menu on every page that is coloured to be very nearly impossible to read. Was this a deliberate irony (to contrast with the simplicity of the text) or just a terrible graphical design choice? :)
The colours look good when the text is white by the way.
Yeah. I really should just delete that whole site. It hasn’t been updated, nor its CSS fixed, for years. But people keep contacting me about it, not realizing it’s way out of date, which is of course my own fault.
There are no dates, so there’s no way for anyone to know how old it is. You have your reasons for not organising it as a blog, but one advantage of the blog format is that every entry automatically gets timestamped.
Back in 2007, I was pretty critical of Tim’s book. But I don’t know whether I would agree with lukeprog2007 if I read that book again today.
The similarity of Tim’s conclusions to yours can not be ignored.
I found it amusing that your blog advertises at the top:
… then includes a menu on every page that is coloured to be very nearly impossible to read. Was this a deliberate irony (to contrast with the simplicity of the text) or just a terrible graphical design choice? :)
The colours look good when the text is white by the way.
Yeah. I really should just delete that whole site. It hasn’t been updated, nor its CSS fixed, for years. But people keep contacting me about it, not realizing it’s way out of date, which is of course my own fault.
There are no dates, so there’s no way for anyone to know how old it is. You have your reasons for not organising it as a blog, but one advantage of the blog format is that every entry automatically gets timestamped.
Your link to WP (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_Ferriss#Reviews) is now broken.