How’s this different from women’s magazines having articles on how to “get” a man? Is this not idiomatically equivalent to “be more attractive to more-attractive men”? If so, then why the double standard?
What double standard? Did anyone here claim that using language that teats men as objects is fine? Is Cosmo now supposed to be our standard of excellence?
What double standard? Did anyone here claim that using language that teats men as objects is fine? Is Cosmo now supposed to be our standard of excellence?