I wonder if their judgement of quality was a coincidence? It seems odd that they would judge it a good story, while reinterpreting the plot … well, not all that comprehensively—not a lot of meaning gets changed...
Anyway, it might be interesting to see if their judgement of story-quality is roughly randomized across Western literature, or if they remain parallel even when interpretations differ.
Huh.
I wonder if their judgement of quality was a coincidence? It seems odd that they would judge it a good story, while reinterpreting the plot … well, not all that comprehensively—not a lot of meaning gets changed...
Anyway, it might be interesting to see if their judgement of story-quality is roughly randomized across Western literature, or if they remain parallel even when interpretations differ.