The referenced article is quite long (75 pages). Luke’s podcast interview with Lydia McGrew is quite interesting, IMO, if the article is longer than you wish to read. The podcast is a great example of a civil dialog between an apologist and a skeptic. Ms. McGrew’s outlook is somewhat different from many well-known apologists and I think the podcast (which I am listening to now) will be interesting to many LW’ers. Interestingly, about 2⁄3 through the interview, she puts forward a refutation of the fine tuning argument—it is a refutation that had occurred to me before, but that I had never thought all the way through, so I was surprised to hear it precisely articulated (particularly by a Christian apologist).
Presumably because today is Easter and therefore the article is relevant to the date.
The referenced article can be easily located using Google. Here’s a current link:
Bayesian defense of the resurrection of Jesus
The referenced article is quite long (75 pages). Luke’s podcast interview with Lydia McGrew is quite interesting, IMO, if the article is longer than you wish to read. The podcast is a great example of a civil dialog between an apologist and a skeptic. Ms. McGrew’s outlook is somewhat different from many well-known apologists and I think the podcast (which I am listening to now) will be interesting to many LW’ers. Interestingly, about 2⁄3 through the interview, she puts forward a refutation of the fine tuning argument—it is a refutation that had occurred to me before, but that I had never thought all the way through, so I was surprised to hear it precisely articulated (particularly by a Christian apologist).