Basically this. I think that the moral anti-realists are right and there’s no single correct morality, including population ethics. (Corollary: There’s no wrong morals except from perspective or for signalling purposes.)
(Corollary: There’s no wrong morals except from perspective or for signalling purposes.)
Do you consider perspective something experiential or is it conceptual? If the former, is there a shared perspective of sentient life in some respects? E.g. “suffering feels bad”.
Basically this. I think that the moral anti-realists are right and there’s no single correct morality, including population ethics. (Corollary: There’s no wrong morals except from perspective or for signalling purposes.)
Surely Future-Tuesday-suffering-indifference is wrong?
Do you consider perspective something experiential or is it conceptual? If the former, is there a shared perspective of sentient life in some respects? E.g. “suffering feels bad”.
I consider it experiential, but I’m talking about a “true or objective moral values, and all others are false.” fashion.