I would like to vote up this recommendation:
How about a technological solution for representing arguments with clarity so that both sides: can see what is being said in clearly labeled propositions.can identify errors in logic and mark them down.can weed out opinions from experimentally confirmed scientific facts.can link to sources and have a way to recursively examine their ‘truth rating’ down to the most primary source.
How about a technological solution for representing arguments with clarity so that both sides:
can see what is being said in clearly labeled propositions.
can identify errors in logic and mark them down.
can weed out opinions from experimentally confirmed scientific facts.
can link to sources and have a way to recursively examine their ‘truth rating’ down to the most primary source.
This is an un-explored area, and seems to me like it would have a higher ROI than a deep dive into variations on voting/rating/reputation systems.
I would like to vote up this recommendation:
This is an un-explored area, and seems to me like it would have a higher ROI than a deep dive into variations on voting/rating/reputation systems.