For example, the thinking in the post anticipations would presumably be taken not to be philosophy, but it sounds a whole lot to me like a quick and dirty advocacy of anti-realism.
Hmm. I sounds to me like a kind of methodological twist on logical positivism...just don’t bother with things that don’t have empirical consequences.
Hmm. I sounds to me like a kind of methodological twist on logical positivism...just don’t bother with things that don’t have empirical consequences.