He generally sucks bad at writing endings, even to otherwise excellent novels.
A review that I read of The Cat Who Walks Through Walls said that it was two thirds of a good novel, followed by one third of a good novel, but not the same novel. That seems apt to me, and I’d apply it to at least a few of his others (Friday and The Number of the Beast come to mind).
Less to Friday, though. What you’ve got to get about Friday is that it’s about someone peripheral to events, who will stay peripheral to events even if important things sometimes happen through her. If you accept that, then the book is a lot more satisfying. Waiting for something that’s not going to happen made it worse. I think it still has some issues around her opinions of the guy who pops up again at the end not really being adequately justified.
A review that I read of The Cat Who Walks Through Walls said that it was two thirds of a good novel, followed by one third of a good novel, but not the same novel. That seems apt to me, and I’d apply it to at least a few of his others (Friday and The Number of the Beast come to mind).
The same applies to The Door Into Summer.
Less to Friday, though. What you’ve got to get about Friday is that it’s about someone peripheral to events, who will stay peripheral to events even if important things sometimes happen through her. If you accept that, then the book is a lot more satisfying. Waiting for something that’s not going to happen made it worse. I think it still has some issues around her opinions of the guy who pops up again at the end not really being adequately justified.