I don’t understand what any interpretations besides MWI, collapse, and Bohm/hidden-variables are even saying ontologically
They all seem to reduce to many worlds, hidden variables, collapse, or gibberish.
and Bohm has serious zombie problems.
As Mike Price of the MWI FAQ liked to say, “Bohm+Ockham=Everett”.
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
They all seem to reduce to many worlds, hidden variables, collapse, or gibberish.
As Mike Price of the MWI FAQ liked to say, “Bohm+Ockham=Everett”.