The thing is, given that 33% of the respondents were “familiar” with Hanlen et al, 2022, it is hard for me to know how to interpret this.
What exactly are these 22%? Are they bored virologists who check boxes at random? Did they really thoroughly read DEFUSE and then it had absolutely no impact on them, so they’re like some kind of zombie?
I think the conclusion to this is basically to completely disregard expert opinion: listen to arguments, not to credentials.
Did you scroll down to see what people who were familiar with DEFUSE said?
The thing is, given that 33% of the respondents were “familiar” with Hanlen et al, 2022, it is hard for me to know how to interpret this.
What exactly are these 22%? Are they bored virologists who check boxes at random? Did they really thoroughly read DEFUSE and then it had absolutely no impact on them, so they’re like some kind of zombie?
I think the conclusion to this is basically to completely disregard expert opinion: listen to arguments, not to credentials.