This is also a good example of why you’re getting downvoted so much. Passive agressive and snide. The only one of the trifecta you’re missing this time is insulting. If you want to make productive communication more likely you would be well advised to modify your tone, and to avoid insults, denotationally as in the comment I replied to above, and conotationally, as in the comment you thought better of in your conversation with SilasBarta.
It’s deserved—I wasn’t being productive, or constructive, or even particularly coherent.
It surprised me too.
I think various Issues of mine that nobody cares about all came together yesterday, and so I’d be better off to just avoid discussing economics altogether. At least until I can be unemotional about it (if ever).
Sorry for polluting the thread, back to public-key encryption...
I regret I could only downvote this once.
Here’s another, hop to it...
This is also a good example of why you’re getting downvoted so much. Passive agressive and snide. The only one of the trifecta you’re missing this time is insulting. If you want to make productive communication more likely you would be well advised to modify your tone, and to avoid insults, denotationally as in the comment I replied to above, and conotationally, as in the comment you thought better of in your conversation with SilasBarta.
It’s deserved—I wasn’t being productive, or constructive, or even particularly coherent. It surprised me too. I think various Issues of mine that nobody cares about all came together yesterday, and so I’d be better off to just avoid discussing economics altogether. At least until I can be unemotional about it (if ever). Sorry for polluting the thread, back to public-key encryption...
No worries. If you feel like discussing macroeconomics start a discussion thread.