more widespread, “itadakimasu!”
realitygrill
Karma: 177
If I get you, you’re saying that in practice getting to level 4 generally carries you past that gap. Like the patterns of thought accrete into a sort of momentum.
Interesting, but seems unconvincing and not very motivating.
Assuming the CDT system, I’d presume that most people on LessWrong have hit 4⁄3; level 4 is simply defined to be the level at which you reliably apply metacognition. Fine, but I don’t see that reliably applying metacognition dissolves the problems of akrasia. Right now I’d say that level 4 is necessary, but insufficient. There’s a gap. Or, at least I perceive a gap.
So here’s my question: Are you unable to imagine someone who holds themselves as object having akrasia, or do you think such people cannot exist?
“I know many folks who have been part of the Less Wrong community for a long time yet have thus far won very little.”
This is certainly a concern.
I am out of school, but am an intellectually curious autodidact (not a particularly effective one). I was once considered mathematically gifted but fell off the bandwagon early—no encouragement or mentors. Others I know are in a similar position. This is LW, after all..
A bunch of us would be interested in shoring up and increasing our mathematical abilities, and so would be situationally similar to a homeschooler. Should we still contact you? Otherwise, I’ll wait for your wiki of resources. Thanks!
Thanks for the feedback. I haven’t participated in a while.
Looking for a temporary place in Cambridge starting in September. PM me!
Ahh, did not see that. Thanks.
I dance tango a bit and there’s definitely people you have affinity for dancing with and not. There’s a fair correlation to whom you actually like hanging out with.
I understand this line of thought, but.. strength doesn’t have to be developed through weights, strength increase doesn’t necessarily mean much hypertrophy, and most importantly strength is a prerequisite/accelerator for increasing pretty much all athletic abilities (power, flexibility, endurance..)
I reinvented this method, except using a coin flip, during an urban economics class. We were going to actually conduct surveys in the Detroit area and thus had to learn about the problems with surveys. However my professor didn’t seem very excited and pointed out some incentive shortcomings (I was too disappointed to listen too closely), and I got the impression that this is a known method with known limitations.
The reason I’ve been cited for the dimly lit preference is pupil dilation, a sign of attraction.
There’s artint.info, which I found helpful during ai-class
Useful/helpful.
I found it quite interesting also, especially meeting all those intelligence studies folks.
How did you know the offer wasn’t honored?
I registered and bought air tickets, but some of the details are confusing me. I’m calling them tomorrow to straighten it out.
Interested, though 10-12 hours seems quite short.
They wouldn’t be open to this currently, would they?
upvoted, because I’ve been wondering how the QM sequence is looked upon by physicists :)
I MISSED SCOTT AARONSON’S VISIT? :(
See you all there.
EDIT: I regret that I won’t be able to make this one.