Uh… “morality” is about maximising everyone’s awesomeness? Using what metric?
This is the entire basis for good economists’ objections to the supposed utilitarian basis for the State: it is plain that utility (awesomeness) is not summable-across-people… in fact in all likelihood it is not intertemporally summable for an individual (at a given point in time) since discount rates are neither time-stable or predictable.
So seeking to maximise the present value of all future social utility (the claimed rationale of ‘democracy’ advocates) seems to me an exercise so laden with hubristic nonsense, that only megalomaniacal sociopaths would dare pretend that they could do so (and would do so in order to live in palaces at everyone else’s expense).
How about this: morality is about letting individuals do as they like, so long as their doing so does not impose costs on others.
I expect that people will attend. Upvote that, hooka.
Actually, I expect that people including me will attend.