There are difficulties. Specifically:
how to get people write projects
how to get people fund projects
Improving trust and ease-of-use.
There are difficulties. Specifically:
how to get people write projects
how to get people fund projects
Improving trust and ease-of-use.
A mind is a puzzle to solve, too.
I see, [MattG]. True, and I know why the perceptions. Anyway, we have team members who did projects comparable in size and functionality with booking.com, and are very experienced in Python/Django development, toptal.com level. The [Villiam]’s estimate of $100 is laughable.
Who said that there exists the outside? :)
So you are very undefined. I know that I’m an ‘infinitesimal’ part of the observable universe, which wishes to understand: the Universe, and where and how does it originate; wishes that everything that anyone truly wishes could really exist; and, doesn’t lose the hope to improve the whole Universe, because it knows that butterfly effect works… if used properly.
[Lumifer], what you are? Are you what you think you are? What kind of future do you want to have?
[Viliam], thanks for feedback. I’ve no time to refute half or so of your statements, which are stated without having proper information—just guesses.
From what I understand, it’s something that LW could get behind—a way to crowdsource ideas then crowdfund them, and get equity based on how much of the idea you helped to generate. That’s not a bad idea with some refinement.
Good point.
I have some ideas on how to actually make sure this grows, if you’re interested.
Definitely interested.
What point which you want to make requires me answering ‘who supplies money to you?’ question?
See, we are not talking about the modern world. We are talking about changing the world to create the world of abundance.
Is exciting! :) [To be rational, we must work for well-defined goals, not for money that lacks descriptive power.]
On the contrary, it is worrisome that some people treat others as merely workforce that can be bought, and lack any empathy whatsoever.
I did try to look. My browser said “Secure Connection Failed”.
Ha:) Is that because we use self-signed SSL cert? Try again. We’ll upgrade cert later.
So, all of hyper-equity can be controlled by 1,000 − 10,000 people?
No, as many people as there are problems (Goals). Potentially infinite.
All these words and only for a pyramid scheme....
If you look, currently the fraction of “hyper-equity” that a user can have, is very small (0.0001 to 0.001), and I believe we should use risk models to adjust it in the future, with everyone’s help, and choose the appropriate maximum amount of it. The reason why we have so little of hyper-equity, is because it precisely because we would like to avoid an unreasonable pyramid scheme.
Many people can’t go into long conversations about each other simply because answering requires more than one click. Even Google can’t conceive of a better way of communication than Google Plus. I have to retype my answers to everyone around, whenever I get to meet a new person, I can’t easily reuse my previous answers from an autosuggest list, and why not? Here is my idea, which I shared on halfbakery.com:
“Profiles should contain a ‘magic FAQ.’ Any vistor of your profile should be able to add a publicly invisible question to your magic FAQ; you would be notified, and have an option to answer it, both replying the questions and building your FAQ at the same time (one shot-two birds). The publicly invisible conversation could continue much like hierarchical comments, forming a hierarchy. The next time someone asks a similar question (i.e., adds a question to your FAQ), you could tell the system that it’s just another way to ask the same thing, and reuse your previous answer with a click of a button. A different follow-up question? No problem—the data structure like pHTN (probabilistic hierarchical task network, which is just hierarchically arranged lists with probabilities of each element in the lower level of the hierarchy) can handle this, and even learn to autosuggest you to reuse your most preferred answer (three birds?).
An expected result of this idea, is that even celebrities, who don’t have enough time to chat with every fan, would suddenly have time to communicate personally, in this semi-automated manner.”
No worries. We’ve got another revenue model, but thanks—a good suggestion.:)