I believe I will be able to attend.
We might be well-served by finding a new place to meet with more space or seating for the next meeting. The Starbucks got to be rather crowded last time.
bisserlis
Karma: 122
Well, it didn’t sit 20. We stood around and blocked traffic mostly.
Believe me, you can’t keep me away.
My username for everything is the same as my username here, possibly with @gmail.com appended if necessary.
I too feel like I lack the wherewithal to write top-level LessWrong posts, but since this is a topic I too am interested in, perhaps we could collaborate and produce something worthy between us. If your issue is not being able to write clearly, I would gladly proofread and comment on drafts.
Wait. Isn’t The Mankind Project the one that has been at the center of the… controversy surrounding the lawyer and the forced retreat? The articles I read on the issue made it sound like they used cult tactics and were variously disreputable. Would you care to share your experience?
Shhh, if you’re not careful, patronuses will be sentient next. Is it ethical to dismiss a sentient patronus?
Interesting. I’m not sure whether or not it’s better at shielding, because we’re told that people break in to Azkaban to shield the inmates so that they might have regular non-nightmare dreams, or just a half-day of patronus time. So we know that just one typical patronus is strong enough to protect people from the worst effects of a Dementor for 12 hours.
I don’t think we know enough about the defenses of Azkaban to say at what point the typical rescue operation would fail. But when we’re witnessing the aurors in the command center, I find it interesting that only attempts to relieve the pain of being in Azkaban through patronus-presence are brought up (in the bit about bribes), not escape attempts. Perhaps it has to do with the “perfect crime” logic.
As to what the actual purpose was in this whole excursion, I have no idea.
I’m not sure intentional failure is the only explanation. It could be some weird bonding experience. Maybe Quirrel always dreamed of raiding wizarding prisons, pulling off bank heists, and taking over the world with his son. Chapter 55: “Adoption Papers”
I think from the duel that we can infer that Quirrel didn’t expect to lose, even in a one-sided fight against a team of aurors. He was just playing games when it was one-on-one. Maybe he used the killing curse because he was (overly) confident that Harry was committed to trusting him completely with regards to this mission and didn’t expect to be blocked.
Maybe chapter 55 will answer all of our questions. Ha. Haha.
I’m still confused. I think because I assume that saving Bellatrix was definitely not the point of the trip, and whatever the real point was, it specifically has to do with Harry so Quirrel’s patronus status is irrelevant with respect to the Azkaban trip. Couldn’t Quirrel always have used an ally in the plot? They wouldn’t even necessarily have to be willing or reliable on their own, or can’t you summon a patronus under the imperius curse?
Now I feel like I did when reading the chapter on the final army battle. I think I’m an n-1 player.
Wait, can you explain why lacking a patronus is evidence against Quirrel being a time-traveling Harry? He would have the same super-bright human patronus that Harry does, which would be a bit of a tip that he was Harry-from-the-future. So obviously he would pretend to not have one.
My track record with completing courses online and staying on task is terrible, whereas I’m fantastic about remembering to show up to things in person and I really learn well from experiencing things when physically present. If this were a class in Berkeley (relating back to the original point of this posting tangentially) I would definitely be there taking it.
Also, I like the term “rainbow art”, but rainbows are linked with the indelibly good in my mind. What about “grey arts”? Or just tools?
I for one would absolutely love a rationalist Toastmasters. I haven’t found a good fit with any of the existing groups in the Bay Area.
Do you know anything specifically about the formation of new Toastmasters groups?
A rationalist Toastmasters Speakers Bureau in the area could also be really cool and useful, by the way. I know of a number of groups who would love to host speakers on LW topics.
I live in the Bay Area now and have experience running outreach organizations. Specifically I ran a student secular group in New York for two years, and I’ve been involved on the national level with a large atheist organization. Some skills that I have from that are good for event planning and promotion, public relations, running social meetings, recruiting new members, that sort of thing.
Also, I can knit, which is very relaxing. You can also make awesome geek-chic cold weather gear.
I said I’d show up to the last one, then I forgot, but this time I’m writing it down on a sheet of paper tacked to the wall above my computer.
I’ll be able to make it, and appreciate it being so close to public transportation.
I finally registered just to participate in this.
I’m living in Buffalo, NY for the summer if anyone is up for a meetup.
On a related note, one topic that came up particularly frequently that some of us bonded over was rarely or never contributing. So to anyone out there lurking, don’t be afraid to come just because you don’t post. You won’t be alone.