RSS

The Sig­nal­ing Trilemma

TagLast edit: Jan 3, 2022, 12:18 AM by Pablo

The belief signaling trilemma (or signaling trilemma for simplicity) points out that (a) people assign reputation based on claims; (b) people want to maintain their reputation; therefore, (c) people warp their claims. This presents a trilemma:

  1. We could agree to stop assigning reputation based on beliefs, but this would deprive us of an extremely valuable tool for evaluating others, besides being impossible to enforce.

  2. We could agree to always report honest beliefs, but this could be very costly for cooperators and again impossible to enforce.

  3. We could embrace dishonest reporting of beliefs, but this can severely warp the discourse.

Related tags/​pages: Deception, Honesty, Meta-Honesty, Signaling

The Belief Sig­nal­ing Trilemma

Scott GarrabrantSep 20, 2013, 12:50 AM
21 points
49 comments2 min readLW link

Firm­ing Up Not-Ly­ing Around Its Edge-Cases Is Less Broadly Use­ful Than One Might Ini­tially Think

Zack_M_DavisDec 27, 2019, 5:09 AM
128 points
43 comments8 min readLW link2 reviews

Maybe Ly­ing Can’t Ex­ist?!

Zack_M_DavisAug 23, 2020, 12:36 AM
58 points
16 comments5 min readLW link

Maybe Ly­ing Doesn’t Exist

Zack_M_DavisOct 14, 2019, 7:04 AM
70 points
59 comments8 min readLW link

Can crimes be dis­cussed liter­ally?

BenquoMar 22, 2020, 8:17 PM
102 points
38 comments2 min readLW link3 reviews
(benjaminrosshoffman.com)

Com­mu­ni­ca­tion Re­quires Com­mon In­ter­ests or Differ­en­tial Sig­nal Costs

Zack_M_DavisMar 26, 2021, 6:41 AM
40 points
13 comments3 min readLW link1 review

How hard is it for al­tru­ists to dis­cuss go­ing against bad equil­ibria?

abramdemskiJun 22, 2019, 3:42 AM
46 points
6 comments11 min readLW link
No comments.