I suspect that the issue is not terseness, but rather not understanding and bridging the inferential distance between you and your audience. It’s hard for me to say more without a specific example.
revisiting this, i consider that perhaps i am likely to discard parts of the frame message and possibly outer message—because, to me of course it’s a message, and to me of course the meaning of (say) “belief” is roughly what http://wiki.lesswrong.com/wiki/Belief says it is
I suspect that the issue is not terseness, but rather not understanding and bridging the inferential distance between you and your audience. It’s hard for me to say more without a specific example.
revisiting this, i consider that perhaps i am likely to discard parts of the frame message and possibly outer message—because, to me of course it’s a message, and to me of course the meaning of (say) “belief” is roughly what http://wiki.lesswrong.com/wiki/Belief says it is