I agree fairly strongly, but this seems far from the final word on the subject, to me.
Hmm, actually I think you’re right and that it may be more complex than this.
Ah. I take you to be saying that the quality of the clever arguer’s argument can be high variance, since there is a good deal of chance in the quality of evidence cherry-picking is able to find. A good point.
Exactly. There may only be a weak correlation between evidence and truth. And maybe you can do something with it or maybe it’s better to focus on stronger signals instead.
Hmm, actually I think you’re right and that it may be more complex than this.
Exactly. There may only be a weak correlation between evidence and truth. And maybe you can do something with it or maybe it’s better to focus on stronger signals instead.