I think the general setup should be “all posts” at least, since it’s so straightforward to look at a post separately from a list of each concept.
I think I have a specific concept for something I’m trying to say, but I didn’t know how to describe that concept.
I think I’ve solved the problem of having to explicitly list several things to say in order to get to the kind of answer which results in more answers. If I just don’t feel like doing this by the time you get to the next one, I guess it’d be useful to have my own concept.
That’s what actually makes the post a better concept.
The main problem is with getting your concept to work together that’s not how things really work together. I don’t think it really helps to have that concept to work together on an underlying, just a) you can’t, a) I don’t think you could work together on a new concept, and b) even if it doesn’t, you have to have the concept in your area of expertise to build it into a new concept.
So I’m hoping that it doesn’t sound too insane to list a concept and then tell me how to do it, without which the concepts are useless.
Some thoughts on the latter thought, which I do in a few places:
It may be that your concept is already a large part of your concept, but that it doesn’t have to be a big part of it.
It may be that this insight isn’t always useful in other kinds of contexts. I’m not sure that this is always true for some context-related things, but it seems like a useful concept that’s already built into my brain.
I’m not sure what to make of the “if anyone had a concept and I just don’t keep track of it, it’s not safe to ignore it” distinction.
Overall, it seems like this has been more generally useful, and I’m now aware that having several threads of thought seems easier and more natural to many people in some contexts, but has this explanation as the thing to remember? I don’t think it is, though.
I also hope for the rest of you to find it
I think the general setup should be “all posts” at least, since it’s so straightforward to look at a post separately from a list of each concept.
I think I have a specific concept for something I’m trying to say, but I didn’t know how to describe that concept.
I think I’ve solved the problem of having to explicitly list several things to say in order to get to the kind of answer which results in more answers. If I just don’t feel like doing this by the time you get to the next one, I guess it’d be useful to have my own concept.
That’s what actually makes the post a better concept.
The main problem is with getting your concept to work together that’s not how things really work together. I don’t think it really helps to have that concept to work together on an underlying, just a) you can’t, a) I don’t think you could work together on a new concept, and b) even if it doesn’t, you have to have the concept in your area of expertise to build it into a new concept.
So I’m hoping that it doesn’t sound too insane to list a concept and then tell me how to do it, without which the concepts are useless.
Some thoughts on the latter thought, which I do in a few places:
It may be that your concept is already a large part of your concept, but that it doesn’t have to be a big part of it.
It may be that this insight isn’t always useful in other kinds of contexts. I’m not sure that this is always true for some context-related things, but it seems like a useful concept that’s already built into my brain.
I’m not sure what to make of the “if anyone had a concept and I just don’t keep track of it, it’s not safe to ignore it” distinction.
Overall, it seems like this has been more generally useful, and I’m now aware that having several threads of thought seems easier and more natural to many people in some contexts, but has this explanation as the thing to remember? I don’t think it is, though. I also hope for the rest of you to find it