Hi Dave, thanks for the great input from the insider perspective.
Do you have any thoughts on whether risk-aversion (either product-related or misalignment-risk) might be contributing to a migration of talent towards lower-governance zones?
If so, are there any effective ways to combat this that don’t translate to accepting higher levels of risk?
For sure product risk aversion leads towards people moving to where they can have some impact, for people who don’t want pure research roles. I think this is basically fine—I don’t think that product risk is all that concerning at least for now.
Misalignment risk would be a different story but I’m not aware of cases where people moved because of it. (I might not have heard, of course.)
Hi Dave, thanks for the great input from the insider perspective.
Do you have any thoughts on whether risk-aversion (either product-related or misalignment-risk) might be contributing to a migration of talent towards lower-governance zones?
If so, are there any effective ways to combat this that don’t translate to accepting higher levels of risk?
For sure product risk aversion leads towards people moving to where they can have some impact, for people who don’t want pure research roles. I think this is basically fine—I don’t think that product risk is all that concerning at least for now.
Misalignment risk would be a different story but I’m not aware of cases where people moved because of it. (I might not have heard, of course.)