A > B > human. I expect B < human would also be quite useful.
B does not have a lot of opportunity for action—all it can do is prevent A from acting. It seems like its hard to “eliminate humans” with just that freedom. I agree B has an incentive to hamper A.
Even a B that is dumber than humans is valuable, because it is faster than humans. B can provide real-time feedback on every action that A takes, whereas consulting humans for every action would be impractical—it costs too much human time and it would prevent A from operating in realtime.
A > B > human. I expect B < human would also be quite useful.
B does not have a lot of opportunity for action—all it can do is prevent A from acting. It seems like its hard to “eliminate humans” with just that freedom. I agree B has an incentive to hamper A.
Even a B that is dumber than humans is valuable, because it is faster than humans. B can provide real-time feedback on every action that A takes, whereas consulting humans for every action would be impractical—it costs too much human time and it would prevent A from operating in realtime.