EDIT: In case you didn’t notice, I’m not arguing for race realism—my introductory remarks state that I don’t get it. However, I’m arguing against the egalitarian premise. You attack the premises I supposedly hold—what’s your explanation of 2.2 billion dollars failing to achieve anything?
I cite and link that fact—and reference the Colour of Crime study, which I do not link, but is easably searchable.
Can you explain either of these? Or… is it just racism that’s behind it all?
My theory fits the facts. Your theory is comfortable, and fits the political will.
EDIT: In case you didn’t notice, I’m not arguing for race realism—my introductory remarks state that I don’t get it. However, I’m arguing against the egalitarian premise. You attack the premises I supposedly hold—what’s your explanation of 2.2 billion dollars failing to achieve anything?
I cite and link that fact—and reference the Colour of Crime study, which I do not link, but is easably searchable.
Can you explain either of these? Or… is it just racism that’s behind it all?
My theory fits the facts. Your theory is comfortable, and fits the political will.
Edited.
(I’ve expanded my comment to hopefully make it more clear what I mean.)
See? You are racist against Asians, you just don’t know it yet! (I’m not, I merely pointed out the racist reference.)
:trollface: