It’s… weird, to put it lightly, that you are responding to neutral-toned feedback with hostility.
It reminds me of years ago on Wikipedia, back when we thought neutrality meant odious people should at least be of use in defending their viewpoints, and tried to actually interact with the politer variety of neo-Nazi to see if they could actually add anything worth knowing to the articles about them. Always, about two or three responses in, they’d reliably go non-linear, in ways very like we’re seeing here. This substantiates the view that “race realists” under whatever label aren’t the best at working an epistemology.
it parrots the university line at the drop of a hat.
Alluding to an academic conspiracy was typical too.
It reminds me of years ago on Wikipedia, back when we thought neutrality meant odious people should at least be of use in defending their viewpoints, and tried to actually interact with the politer variety of neo-Nazi to see if they could actually add anything worth knowing to the articles about them. Always, about two or three responses in, they’d reliably go non-linear, in ways very like we’re seeing here. This substantiates the view that “race realists” under whatever label aren’t the best at working an epistemology.
Alluding to an academic conspiracy was typical too.
Thank you for this phrase.