I think so, too, but I don’t know it (Eliezer’s Sequence on QM is still on my reading list). Given the importance people around here put on Bayes theorem, I find it quite surprising that the idea of a quantum generalization -which is what QBism is about- isn’t discussed here apart from a handful of isolated comments. Two notable papers in this direction are
I don’t think the QM sequence would tell you anything you don’t know.
The story is that EY became super convinced by Deutch’s Fabric or Reality, and never really looked into any approaches other than the ones DD mentioned.
I think so, too, but I don’t know it (Eliezer’s Sequence on QM is still on my reading list). Given the importance people around here put on Bayes theorem, I find it quite surprising that the idea of a quantum generalization -which is what QBism is about- isn’t discussed here apart from a handful of isolated comments. Two notable papers in this direction are
https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0106133
https://arxiv.org/abs/0906.2187
I don’t think the QM sequence would tell you anything you don’t know.
The story is that EY became super convinced by Deutch’s Fabric or Reality, and never really looked into any approaches other than the ones DD mentioned.