Not even that—it’s as if he and other commenters (e.g. Unknown in this case) are simply demanding that Eliezer express his points with less conviction.
If you think Eliezer is wrong, say so and explain why. Merely protesting that he is “confident beyond what is justified”, or whatever, amounts to pure noisemaking that is of no use to anyone.
Caledonian’s job is to contradict Eliezer.
Not even that—it’s as if he and other commenters (e.g. Unknown in this case) are simply demanding that Eliezer express his points with less conviction.
If you think Eliezer is wrong, say so and explain why. Merely protesting that he is “confident beyond what is justified”, or whatever, amounts to pure noisemaking that is of no use to anyone.