FYI, since I think you missed this: According to the responsible scaling policy update, the Long-Term Benefit Trust would “have sufficient oversight over the [responsible scaling] policy implementation to identify any areas of non-compliance.”
Share results of ASL evaluations promptly with Anthropic’s governing bodies, including the board of directors and LTBT, in order to sufficiently inform them of changes to our risk profile.
Responsible Scaling Officer. There is a designated member of staff responsible for ensuring that our Responsible Scaling Commitments are executed properly. Each quarter, they will share a report on implementation status to our board and LTBT, explicitly noting any deficiencies in implementation. They will also be responsible for sharing ad hoc updates sooner if there are any substantial implementation failures.
(This is nice but much less important than power over board seats.)
FYI, since I think you missed this: According to the responsible scaling policy update, the Long-Term Benefit Trust would “have sufficient oversight over the [responsible scaling] policy implementation to identify any areas of non-compliance.”
This is not relevant to my thesis: maybe the Trust can be overruled or abrogated by stockholders.
I agree that the Trust has some oversight over the RSP:
(This is nice but much less important than power over board seats.)