A trivialist would insist that “Trivialists argue ¬(p∧¬p) is false” is true. Believing that you’re arguing something isn’t quite the same as arguing something, but I wanted to point out that under trivialism, trivialists think they’re arguing for and against all propositions simultaneously.
A trivialist would insist that “Trivialists argue ¬(p∧¬p) is false” is true. Believing that you’re arguing something isn’t quite the same as arguing something, but I wanted to point out that under trivialism, trivialists think they’re arguing for and against all propositions simultaneously.