Hmm, perhaps another way to put it would be that I would like there to be one “standard of discourse” across the site, and multiple types of conversations that can be had within that standard.
What distinction would you draw between that and “there is a meta-standard that includes either 2, or possibly hundreds, of conversation-types?”
(I have come around to “‘hundreds of conversation’ types are pretty confusing and not a good idea”, but not sure which principle you’re drawing.
Hmm, perhaps another way to put it would be that I would like there to be one “standard of discourse” across the site, and multiple types of conversations that can be had within that standard.
What distinction would you draw between that and “there is a meta-standard that includes either 2, or possibly hundreds, of conversation-types?”
(I have come around to “‘hundreds of conversation’ types are pretty confusing and not a good idea”, but not sure which principle you’re drawing.